Who are you calling dumb?

Filed under: WINE, flaws in wine — Tom C February 28, 2007 @ 4:23 pm

Now that's dumb!

You may or may not have heard the term before. Perhaps you’ve come across its alias, “mute”? No? Well, if you tend to drink your wines young or tend to drink youthful, fruit driven wines, this is not a surprise. So exactlty what are we talking about here?

These terms refer to the level of a wine’s “expressiveness” - the aromas and flavors that a wine yields. But in this case, it’s more about what the wine is NOT doing than what it is…

The terms “dumb” or “mute” are usually used in reference to wines that are ageworthy that are, give or take a year or two on either side, in their “middle years”, though it is indeed possible for a very young wine to be said to be dumb. Let’s start at the beginning…

Wines that are capable of long-term aging often go through several phases of aroma, texture, taste, etc. as the many chemical processes that allow for this longevity wax and wane over time. For example, highly ageworthy wines like Barolo, Bordeaux, Port, Rioja et al. which are most often at their peak drinking form from between about 10-30 years from the vintage date, often make more pleasurable drinking on release than they do let’s say two or three years down the line. Frequently, though the tanninc structures of these wines can be fierce on release, they often retain a great deal of the “baby fat” fruit character that can balance these as of yet unrepentant tannins. These types of wines drunk in their extreme youth hardly represent these wines’ full potentials, but they can indeed be hedonistically direct and can also give a fascinating glimpse into what a winemaker encounters when all of his or her labors in the vineyard as well as in the cellar are “in the books”, and he or she has to decide “Are we ready to bottle or not”? Evaluating barrel samples is one of the last great skills that comes to the aspiring master palate, and tasting just-bottled highly ageworthy wines is as close to this often humbling experience as most of us get.

So once a wine moves out of its infancy, we begin to be able to encounter “dumbness” in the bottle. So let’s get down to brass tacks - what EXACTLY are we talking about here? At least in my definition, dumbness is the descriptor used to represent a wine that doesn’t taste or smell of much of anything, or seems to be less “expressive” than one would expect. Other descriptors that are used to denote this same phenomenon are “closed down”, “shut down”, or “tight”, though the term “tight” might be more frequently used as a less pronounced interpretation of “dumb”…

OK, you’ve pulled the cork, you’ve let the wine breathe for 30-60 minutes, you pour out the wine, swirl and sniff and…NOTHING (or not much). You let the wine rest in the glass for another ten to fifteeen minutes, and still nothing. The wine has gone dumb. What can be done? My advice is a good, roiling decanting. Sometimes, a rigorous infusion of air can wake up a sleeping wine, but then again, sometimes not…and if not, there’s really not much that you can do. For whatever reason (and the science is STILL not yet clear) wines that have gone dumb cannot be revived with a short term “fix”…whatever has happened or not happened in that bottle cannot be remedied with a post uncorking aeration or not at least before the air begins to turn the wine into vinegar…If you get to this point, you’re just plain S.O.L.

But there is a way to make at least a LITTLE sangria from sour grapes…One can learn a bit about the wine, and hopefully use this knowledge to avoid this problem in the future. Questions/notes that one can ask/record oneself that can be helpful are:

- What kind of wine is this EXACTLY? - Note this, and try to retain it. You may begin to find patterns.
- What is the VINTAGE of the wine? - Experiment with another wine from the same appellation and the same vintage from a different producer - are you still noticing “dumbness” or not?
- Whatever small amount of aroma IS emanating from the glass, note this as well - REALLY awkward aromas (ones that are not bad per se, but just strange) may indicate that a wine has a LOOOONG way to go before it begins to “speak” again. A wine that is just a bit “shy” might be about to wake up sooner than later…
- If after a decent aeration session has occured, and there is still no satisfaction, let the wine continue to breathe in a COVERED decanter for 24 hours, and then re-taste. Carefully note any further change, and try to make inferences (read “educated guesses”) about the wine’s future drinking window.
- Talk to others that have purchased the same wine. Have they had a similar experience?
- If you cannot find any other buyers of this same wine, if you dare, are able to do so financially, and actually HAVE another bottle of the exact same wine, open it too…in some cases, dumbness is the problem of this or that individual bottle rather than a function of producer, grape, vintage, etc. Clearly, if the problem persists, its a generalized problem rather than an isolated one, and you then know that any further bottles of this wine that are in your possession should be shuffled into the back of your cellar and forgotten about…

When all is said and done, opening up a truly DUMB wine is just one of those unfortunate events in the drinking life of the oenophile It’s not not QUITE as bad as corked wine, which is simply unredeemable, but the net effect can be the same if the wine has truly shut down hard.

So if you find yourself sitting in front of a dumb wine, try as many little wine CPR tricks as you can devise, and if nothing works, chalk it up to experience, learn as much as you can from the disappointment, and move on. One of the best things about wine is that there’s always another chance for a great experience just over that viney ridge…

TOM CIOCCO

5 Comments »

  1. Hey Tom,
    Nice article, as always. I’ve experienced this dummy phase most with malbec, most recently the 2004 Achaval Ferrer Quimera and the 2005 Achaval Ferrer Malbec. These wines showed very muted fruit with great structure and texture, accompanied by graphite and cedar notes. The hint of fruit presented just seemed odd considering all the other characteristics that were just right. Actually, my first ever malbec, the 2004 Obra Prima, was the same way. I’ve chalked this observed tightness up to immaturity, rather than varietal character, though I’m no expert.

    One thing that does puzzle me is: how do you know when they’re muted as opposed to just not there. As above, I’d assumed that a developing wine is well structured, showing good tannin and acidity, yet little of the expected primary varietal character. On the other hand a fatter, smoother, wine, showing the same tightness, would just be past its prime or plain inexpressive. Am I right in my understanding of a “muted” wine.

    Also, would “austere” be a descriptor of a muted wine. Should such character be expected to fade as the wine matures or does this characterize the latter wine described above, less generous?

    Thanks in advance!

    Comment by Andre — March 15, 2007 @ 4:00 am

  2. Andre-

    Hard to describe to someone else what muted fruit vs. devoid of fruit completely in the first place…the way that it shakes out for me is dumb or muted wines give flashes of nice fruit or show lovely aromas at very low to nearly undetectable levels - sort of like a very nice but quickly fleeting sensation.

    In my opinion, austerity and fruitlessness are not necessarily connected. Also, I would use the descriptor “austere” mostly in terms of the palate, while at least in my experience “mute” or “dumb” usually refers to the nose.

    TOM CIOCCO

    Comment by Tom C — March 15, 2007 @ 9:48 am

  3. How do you tell the difference between a wine that is going through a ‘dumb’ stage and those many wines, whose weekest point- the cork, has failed, and be come ‘flat’.

    Bring on the screw caps revolution!

    Comment by Garry — April 2, 2007 @ 11:30 pm

  4. Garry-

    Great question, but kind of hard to answer…for me much of it is simply intuition, but the thing that helps me most is TEXTURE & COLOR…if a wine is dumb, but still chewey, glycerin-y, darker in color, and “weighty”, regardless of how old the wine is, I’m guessing that the wine is truly dumb.

    If however the wine is thin, faded, etc. there is a better chance than not that the wine is shot

    But, I’ve been wrong both ways - in the end, it’s an educated guess, but the more educated (read “experienced”) you are, the better you “guess”

    TOM CIOCCO

    Comment by Tom C — April 3, 2007 @ 4:13 pm

  5. Tom,
    It has been my experience that some of the “dumb” wines you have described can reawaken over time. This muted-ness may sometimes simply be a phase in the evolution of the wine. Thus the brave soul with a case of the dormant wine may be well-advised to cellar the wine for another year or two and try it again. Like a caterpillar, it may simply have taken some time in a crysalis to become an even more attractive butterfly.

    Comment by Austin — June 11, 2007 @ 4:20 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment