U-G-L-Y, you ain’t got no alibi, you’re UGLY!!!

Filed under: WINE — Tom C April 30, 2007 @ 12:26 pm

Bad label

I don’t mean YOU you, but this or that wine label…

As you may or may not know, I purchase wines for The Wine Library across many different categories - all are located in the Old World - Italy, select parts of France, Portugal, Austria, Hungary, Greece, etc. And as you might expect, the WINE ITSELF is always the primary factor determining whether I purchase a wine for the shop or not, but as you also might expect, quality to price ratio, type of wine, continuity of supply, etc. are all considerable factors as well. But when I tell friends and customers that wine LABELS are an important factor in ultimately saying “yes” or “no” to wine, many say “Really”? and I always say “Oh, yes”!

Think about it…One wine’s label has a beautiful etching of an idyllic chateau with elegant, colorful lettering all printed on a fine, bone-colored paper stock. Another’s label is a thin, shiny, plasticized material written in a goofy, awkward font (which is smearing and scuffed), and depicts a dead bird. OK, admittedly a hyberbolic pair of examples, but there are indeed wines that I have eventually rejected not JUST because of a hideous label, but if a wine is (let’s say) DELICIOUS, and fairly priced, but is hopelessly obscure or is a proprietary blend (they are harder to sell), and the label is AWFUL, I probably will NOT buy that wine for our shelves. In my mind, a bottle of wine either does or does not reach a certain sales-oriented “critical mass” that will either tip the drinker to buy or not buy a wine, and the nature and appearance of a wine’s label figures prominently in that equation…

As the line from the old commercial goes: “You never get a second chance to make a first impression”, and this works in spades for wine labels. I have seen on more than one occasion a customer lift up a bottle to more closely examine/read it, see what I always thought to be an UGLY label, wrinkle his or her nose and scowl, and put the bottle back in place. And while I can’t PROVE that the label caused the rejection, it stands to reason that not much else COULD have - they didn’t just taste the wine and dislike it, so it couldn’t have been that, and they were initially attracted enough to the grape variety, or the wine’s place of origin, or even the wine’s price point, to take that closer look but STILL did not purchase the wine. Once again, there is hardly a guaranteed and ironclad connection, but the aesthetics of a wine’s label at least indirectly represents what many people believe about what they can expect from the bottle’s contents. Right or wrong, this is the calculus…

So, I like to think that I haven’t bought a slew of HIDEOUSLY-labelled wines, but just like there are wines that I reject BECAUSE of their labels, there have been more than a few that I have indeed purchased DESPITE their aesthetically-challenged appearances. Here are a few OUTSTANDING wines that don’t get the attention that they deserve due to their ugly duckling looks. All of these wine are beautiful where it really counts - on the INSIDE, so give these something-less-than-covergirl packages a chance to open up and reveal their highly charming personalities on your table…

TOM CIOCCO

Ugly label, GOOD wine #1

Ugly label, GOOD wine #2

Ugly label, GOOD wine #3

Ugly label, GOOD wine #4

Ugly label, GOOD wine #5

Ugly label, GOOD wine #6

Ugly label, GOOD wine #7

6 Comments »

  1. I’d love to see wine labels go a step further. How about an open-up booklet with “liner notes” inside? How about more people putting their winery URL on the label? How about a pop-up label (not trying to market to kids, just think it would be fun for mom & dad)? How about … could go on and on….

    Comment by TagWorld Brian — April 30, 2007 @ 7:39 pm

  2. These aren’t too bad. Maybe a little hard to decipher (if only because I wouldn’t know for the life of me what Sangue di Giuda was, but that probably wouldn’t stop me although the pink might). Now the Sunday Morning SB, that there is one seriously fugly label (although Gary seems to like the wine just fine). Comic Sans is just never a good idea, ever.

    Comment by E — May 1, 2007 @ 11:34 am

  3. E-

    Yeah, these are indeed FAR from the worst labels I have seen, but as I say in the text, if a label is THAT bad, unless the wine is DROP DEAD GORGEOUS, I’ll pass on buying it…

    TOM CIOCCO

    Comment by Tom C — May 1, 2007 @ 11:51 am

  4. You forgot Sunday Mountain Sauv Blanc. What a horrible label, but great wine!

    Comment by cdavis — May 1, 2007 @ 12:10 pm

  5. Maybe I’m the exception rather than the norm, but the aesthetics of a wine label have no bearing whatsoever when I’m selecting (or drinking) new and unfamiliar wines. When I’m browsing one of the French or Italian sections in WL looking to expand my wine horizons, besides price, the two major factors in my decision are:
    1. Look for something from an importer with whom I’ve had a high success rate. My go-to list includes Polaner, Weygandt-Metzler, Louis-Dressner, Neal Rosenthal, T. Edward, and Jon-David Headrick.
    2. The description of the wine in the tasting notes on the shelf talker.

    Points, no matter who they’re from, are not a factor.

    I’ve selected and enjoyed the contents of the Cipriani Teroldego bottle using this methodology, and never even noticed the tacky label design.

    Comment by NickG — May 2, 2007 @ 12:07 pm

  6. Great post Tom; I think the worst is the 80’s Nagel-esque Bruno Verdi Sangue Di Giuda. I also think that I definitely have to pick up a couple of bottles of “Gross”.

    Comment by Harold — May 11, 2007 @ 3:39 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment