<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: stand on more legs (and fins and wings and roots&#8230;)</title>
	<link>http://terroir.winelibrary.com/2007/07/16/stand-on-more-legs-and-fins-and-wings-and-roots/</link>
	<description>A Wine Blog Dedicated To Terrior</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: AnthonyS</title>
		<link>http://terroir.winelibrary.com/2007/07/16/stand-on-more-legs-and-fins-and-wings-and-roots/#comment-116309</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://terroir.winelibrary.com/2007/07/16/stand-on-more-legs-and-fins-and-wings-and-roots/#comment-116309</guid>
					<description>Tom, I agree with you 100%.  I always give a food I never tried before a shot, and 99 times out of 100 I enjoy it and will have it again.  Great piece!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, I agree with you 100%.  I always give a food I never tried before a shot, and 99 times out of 100 I enjoy it and will have it again.  Great piece!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: SLK</title>
		<link>http://terroir.winelibrary.com/2007/07/16/stand-on-more-legs-and-fins-and-wings-and-roots/#comment-116156</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://terroir.winelibrary.com/2007/07/16/stand-on-more-legs-and-fins-and-wings-and-roots/#comment-116156</guid>
					<description>Lightest footprint?

It depends how you're measuring.  Organic has a MUCH lower yield than traditional farming, both in size (of fruits and veggies) and in yield per unit area of land.

So we as humans either chop down lots of forests and jungles (slash and burn, in south america) to feed people organically, or we convert the existing farms over to organic and let hundreds of millions of people, if not billions, starve because we don't want to chop down trees or grow things non-organically.  With all those people or trees (depending which option you choose) rotting away or burning, that's quite a bit of carbon as CO2.

That's not exactly what I would call "a small footprint."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lightest footprint?</p>
<p>It depends how you&#8217;re measuring.  Organic has a MUCH lower yield than traditional farming, both in size (of fruits and veggies) and in yield per unit area of land.</p>
<p>So we as humans either chop down lots of forests and jungles (slash and burn, in south america) to feed people organically, or we convert the existing farms over to organic and let hundreds of millions of people, if not billions, starve because we don&#8217;t want to chop down trees or grow things non-organically.  With all those people or trees (depending which option you choose) rotting away or burning, that&#8217;s quite a bit of carbon as CO2.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not exactly what I would call &#8220;a small footprint.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
