Looking at the world through rose-colored glassware

So many really sound wine-drinking advices and provvisos now seem so much part of the canon of wine-drinking knowledge that many now seem almost too silly to mention, but here’s one that I just need to be sure that everyone has grasped (though one could argue that anyone reading this blog already knows what I’m about to say all too well, but I raise a glass to the few who perhaps don’t, and perhaps more so to the friends and families of those who know, and just need a little extra push to broach the subject…)
…the subject is glassware, but it’s not the same old dilemma about whether this or that glass makes the wine taste different, better, or whatever. This topic is much more basic…
We’ve all been invited to friends or relative’s houses (usually not the residence of an oenophile as we shall see) for some pretty fancy dinners. One if not more of the hosts are excellent cooks, love to, and know how to really entertain guests, are great converstionalists, and really pride themselves on setting a beautiful table, as well. Everything sounds good, right? And for the most part it is, and in the end, this is all one could ask for as a guest, except for one small part of that last point - the part about the table settings…Real care is taken in this arena - matching the linen napkins to the dishware, silverware, tablecloth, etc. If the dinner’s theme is Armenian, this thoughtful host or hostess might even utilize the red, blue, and orange colors of the Armenian flag for that little extra something. Very nice indeed.
But all too often, those that like to fuss that much in their table preparations are also a bit prone to gilding the lily, and this unfortunately can sometimes extend to the stemware. Sadly, in trying to play the theme out past it’s natural level of real functionality, wineglasses wind up dressed up for Halloween, i.e. made up and costumed. I’m talking for instance about those sapphire blue goblets that look more like little vases than wine glasses. I’m also talking about those 9 inch-tall, super thick-rimmed, “antique” styled glasses with the green rims, and the charming bubbles trapped in the ripple-textured glass. Though these types of table settings certainly add a certain “mood” to a table, their presence is nearly wholly aesthetic, and only minimally functional.
I don’t want to make too much of the notion that wine glasses are “tools” to drink wine, but rejecting any such notion out of hand leaves one faced with possibility of drinking wine from crockery coffee mugs or children’s plastic sippy cups. Hyperbole? perhaps, but the glassware mentioned above, not to mention these sorts of vessels, just won’t cut it for the real wine lover.
First, those who love their wine want not only to appreciate it’s aromas and flavors, but its color as well. This is not possible in a tinted or opaque glass. Second, the shapes of many of these more flamboyant glasses are not conducive to either swirling the wine or even maximizing the collection of aromas in the empty space above the wine. Many of these kinds of glasses are V-shaped for example which makes swirling wine more likely that you’ll spalsh it onto the tablecloth or your friend’s wife. That shape also encourages more of the wines aromas to dissipate into the air than to collect in your sinuses. Another aspect of shape can also diminish the wine-drinking experience, and that is glass thickness. Precisely why this is the case no one is sure, but experiment after experiment has shown that the thinner the glass from which one drinks is, the more subjects seems to enjoy the wine. The main theory holds that some microcurrent-related phenomenon or oxygenation effect may be at work when wine spills across a very thin, delicate brim as opposed to a thick, clumsy one. But whatever the actual “scientific” reason for it, I think we’ve all experienced it. For the doubters, take it to the extreme - pour yourself out equal quantities of your favorite wine - one into a $40 glass or crystal stem, and the other dram into a plastic coffee mug, and see from which vessel the wine tastes better…
So at your next dinner party, by all means pull out all of the stops - often the little details are what “make” an evening, but whether your guests are oenophiles or common winos, resist the urge to trade the tried and true elements of a good wine glass for a more obviously, purely “aesthetic” choice.
TOM CIOCCO
5 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

I hate when they do that
, then I feel bad for being so annoyed by this…
Comment by Ferrigno — August 20, 2007 @ 11:31 am
Tom,
You bring up a bit of a sore point in my house. Long before I began to drink wine, my wife began collecting this beautiful and expensive antique Rose Point crystal stemware. The first purchases were about $30 a piece and the price has escalated with each additional purchase. I think they now sell for $80-$100, if you can find them. They are beautifully etched over the entire bowl.
These vessels are, of course, pulled out for every special occasion and holiday dinner. However, since I began having wine with every such meal, they have become a problem. They are shaped like an up side down bell. So, a vigorous swirl is a little like turning a wine spraying lawn sprinkler on your dinner guests, not to mention the nuisance of all the etching.
Usually, I quietly slip out of my chair and grab one of my Riedels out of the cupboard - here’s the rub. The subsequent look I get from my wife, who never allows this maneuver to go undetected, gives me a look that could send mere mortals straight to hell. After 27 years, I am now immune to its affects and remain safely on the earth’s surface.
She is slowly beginning to understand why I refuse to waste good wine by pouring it into a glass that nullifies two of the key senses involved in its enjoyment, but it still bugs her.
Comment by Kent Benson, CSW — August 23, 2007 @ 12:28 am
Tom —
I saw today that Reidel is now hawking “Happy O Wine Tumblers” — those stemless wine glasses introduced a few years ago, but now with a “splash of… color at the base… [that] adds a cheerful flair to your presentation.” The tumblers are decorated in “spring green, baby blue, easter yellow and dawn red.” (Quotes are from the Wine Enthusiast catalog.)
Isn’t it odd that Riedel, which invented the claim that their glasses are scientifically designed to enhance the wine drinking experience, would come out with a line of glasses that actually detracts from the drinker’s ability to fully perceive and appreciate all of a wine’s attributes?
Michael
Comment by Michael Schiaparelli — August 24, 2007 @ 11:36 am
Mike-
Great to hear from you! (FYI, Mike is a former and greatly admired colleague of mine from here at the Wine Library - he now writes a wine column for a newspaper in Cincinnati where he currently lives - those of you in that area should check it out)
It is a bit ironic, right?! Though I can’t be sure about this, and at the risk of stereotyping, I think these glasses are aimed at the “fairer sex”. So much of the nitty-gritty of “serious” wine consumption/appreciation is so overwhelmingly male-dominated that they may have felt that they were leaving a fair amount of money on the table. This is not say that women hate “plain” wine glasses, but they are far more likely to be attracted to the nuances of setting a beautiful table than the average male…thoughts?
TOM CIOCCO
Comment by Tom C — August 24, 2007 @ 1:12 pm
Tom — I don’t know if it’s necessarily being marketed directly at women; I think it’s just a product line extension — trying to force some cash out of the pockets of those folks who need to buy every new wine-related doodad and thingamajig on the market.
While I think the glasses are silly and actually run contrary to Riedel’s corporate marketing proposition, I do love the name — “Happy O.” Hmmmm. I never realized you could buy one of those in a store….
Comment by Michael Schiaparelli — August 26, 2007 @ 6:13 am