Hey everybody, I’d like you to meet Brett…

I wouldn’t quite call Brett a friend…let’s call “him” an infrequent collaborator, and more often, a frequent adversary…Brett’s full name is actually Brettanomyces, and Brett is a yeast. Brett in fact comes from a big family - nine “brothers” and “sisters” actually…to be honest, most of them are problem children, though one or two are not so bad…OK, sustaining the “family” metaphor might get a bit difficult, and probably would also get a bit annoying, so I return to my regularly scheduled style…
Many of you are familiar with Brettanomyces, though you may not know it consciously. Brettanomyces is most often considered to be the source of certain (primarily) flawed aromas in wine. The smell of a brett-infected wine is most often said to display aromas of “sweaty saddle”, or “wet fur”, or even that most evocative descriptor, “barnyard” aromas. Due to some fairly complex chemistry, Brettanomyces is more likely to effect red wines than whites, but encountering Brett in a white wine is not impossible.
But as I’ve alluded to above, Brettanomyces isn’t all bad - there are particular strains of Brett that produce certain kinds of volatile phenol compounds that can lend, in moderate levels, notes of ground brown spices like clove or allspice that can be quite appealing. The problem is is that actually courting the growth of Brett in one’s wines is a dangerous dance indeed, since identifying and isolating just the favorable strains can be nigh on impossible, and if you wind up with the wrong ones, you’re in deep doo-doo. And even if one could be sure that one had 100% of the “good” Brett, a surplus of even these strains, at too high levels, can also unpleasantly distort a wine.
Brettanomyces, once ensconced, is a formidable and tenacious opponent. Like TCA (the acronym for the chemical that causes the “corkiness” smell), Brett can take up residence in so many places in the cellar: in barrels, unsanitary hoses, fermantation tanks, crushers, etc., so idenifying the source of the infestation can be elusive, and one can only be ABSOLUTELY Brett-free by assiduously cleaning EVERYTHING (this includes the floors, walls, ceiling - EVERYTHING), and divesting yourself of every barrel in you cellar. Clearly this can only be done in the “off season”, and is obviously VERY costly to the winemaker. It is for this very unpleasent possibility that most winemakers do not encourage the growth of even the “good” Brett strains…
Thankfully, the rampant growth of Brettanomyces can be prevented and controlled. Those who often wonder why there are sulfites in the wines that they drink can look at least in part to the role that sulfites play in inhibiting the growth of Brett. But sulfites are not a “magic bullet” either - Brett can, and all too often does, fully or partially overcome the effects of the sulfites, making its smelliness quite easily detectable. The only sure ways to elimate Brett is via an involved sterile filtration process that some winemakers feel can damage the final product, and is quite expensive as well, or with the use of a chemical called dimethyl dicarbonate. But while DMDC, as it is abbreviated, can be used in The United States, South Africa, and New Zealand, it is strictly verboten everywhere else, and therefore ceases to be an option for so many wineries.
So let’s get down to the drinking - you’ve got a wine that you think is infected with Brett - what to do? Well, the first thing to make very clear is that Brettanomyces is not toxic in any way, it’s just stinky, so don’t worry about getting sick if you’ve already taken a few sips of the wine before you figured out what that funny smell was…So what to do?…Despite the seeming gravity and irreversible nature of a Brett infection, “Brettiness”, if it is not too intense, can actually “blow off”. Exactly what is afoot in the “blowing off” process I don’t really know (if anybody knows for sure, please educate us), but I’d GUESS that the exposure to air either kills the odor-producing yeasts, or that there is only a small and finite part per million count to begin with, and the inevitable give and take with the air dilutes the compounds below the level of detectability. There are cases however, in which a wine is irredeemably “Bretty”, and in such cases there is little that one can do other than trying to get a refund from your retailer, or failing that, dumping it down the drain. Like corked wines, Brett-infected wines are not even suitable for cooking because the unpleasant aromas can and will be imparted to your food. No good.
TOM CIOCCO
2 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Tom,
As usual, your excellent commentary on Brettanomyces (breh-TAN-uh-MY-sees) prompted me to expand my own understanding of this yeast and its effects on wine.
I was surprised to learn that as far back as the early 1900s, beer makers were deliberately inoculating their beer with brettanomyces in order to give it the character of English beers. I’m told that brettanomyces means British fungus in Latin.
I found no less than 18 separate aromas attributed to brettanomyces: sweaty horse, old leather saddles, barnyard, manure, Band-Aids (this one seems to be dominant), antiseptic, rancid, wet dog, creosote, burnt beans, rotting vegetation, plastic (also prevalent), burnt plastic, vinyl, wet wool, cheese, vomit, and vinegar. Flavors included sour, twangy acidity, and a signature metallic after-taste.
I had always heard the word mousy associated with brettanomyces. However, the research seems to differ. First, mousiness seems to be limited almost exclusively to taste, or more precisely, smelling retro nasally after swallowing. Secondly, wines that have bretty odors rarely smell or taste mousy. The two are virtually mutually exclusive. It is believed that the mousy taste is attributable to a compound produced by brettanomyces, but not by brettanomyces itself.
This might explain what I have always thought to be a peculiar entry in the Oxford Companion to Wine. Under the subject, “faults in wines” it states that brettanomyces “cannot normally be smelled in wine unless it is alkalinized or rubbed in the palm of the hand (an action which neutralizes wine acidity). This mousy flavour is volatile only at neutral or high pH, which explains why it is not immediately apparent but builds up in the back of the mouth once a wine has been swallowed or expectorated, as the palate slowly returns to neutral pH through the buffering action of saliva.”
This entry initially lead me to think brettanomyces could only be tasted, not smelled, when in fact it is mousiness (something different than brettanomyces) that is normally detected only after tasting, while brettanomyces can be detected by its aromas alone.
Comment by Kent Benson, CSW — August 23, 2007 @ 8:56 pm
Tom
Thanks for opening the dicussion on a very complex subject However the last 2 articles show a large amount of unneeded speculation on a well researched subject. It is clearly understood that the olifactory inpact of bret is from downstream chemistries and not directly from this spoilage yeast itvself. there are 4 key by-products. Most common are volatile phenols such as 4ep and 4eg (animal, barnyard bandaid etc).As a matter of fact the id of 4ep is considered proof of bret. volatile fatty acids can result in VA and other ugly critters Tetrahydropyridines are responsibile mousy character and is considered good or bad depending on the concentration. All of the above is dry stuff but most interesting to me is the long standing misinterpretation by many ,including the trade, of all earthy character which shows up in left bank bordeaux,some southern rhones and burgundy as terrior when in fact it is one of the many expressions of bret
Comment by alvin — September 4, 2007 @ 10:45 pm